Executive Summary

Matt Siebenthal and Venomline Bullies (Texas Size Bullies-Delray Beach on FB) have formally documented a years-long "malicious campaign" of business sabotage, intellectual property theft, and fraudulent DMCA reporting allegedly orchestrated by James Oxendine and Southeast Bully Kennels (SEBK). 

Venomline's forensic investigation and legal filings characterize the situation not as a mutual dispute, but as a targeted effort by a "serial offender" to suppress Venomline's market visibility. 

Evidence of Targeted Campaign

• Content Mirroring & IP Theft: Forensic audits claim SEBK replicated over 3,000 words of original Venomline content, including a 94% structural match to proprietary health guarantees and sales contracts. The records show unique typographical errors (e.g., "Bordetilla") were copied directly into SEBK's assets.

• DMCA Abuse: Oxendine is accused of "weaponizing" the DMCA system by filing false copyright strikes against Venomline’s original pages—during peak sales windows to trigger automated account restrictions and monetization loss.

• Personal Harassment: Documentation provided by Siebenthal includes evidence of private family photos being scraped and republished on the SEBK domain. Harassment also allegedly included celebratory messages sent to the family following the death of their foundational dog, Venom.

• Reputation Engineering: The campaign reportedly involved the use of black-hat SEO and fraudulent 1-star reviews posted under the names of actual Venomline clients to damage the brand’s credibility. 

Legal Context & "Serial Offender" Status

Venomline cites federal court case Oxendine v. Blockline Bullies LLC (2024–2025) as a precedent for this behavior. In that case: 

• The court granted summary judgment against Oxendine, ruling that his trademark claim on the term "Block Bloodline" was generic and unenforceable.
• The court dismissed the complaint with prejudice, finding no evidence of consumer confusion or prior use by Oxendine. 

Venomline has submitted a Formal Forensic Audit to platforms like Meta and Google, requesting a manual high-priority review of Oxendine's reporting history to prevent further "tortious interference" and platform manipulation

This declaration asserts the Temporal Precedence and Chain of Custody for all intellectual property originally established under the brand Texas Size Bullies (TSB) between 2015 and 2022.

Unauthorized reproduction, derivative reuse, or misappropriation of content originating from the 2015–2022 TSB archives may constitute infringement and will be treated as an enforceable IP matter by Venomline.

Section I — Chain of Title & Authoritative Origin

I, Matt Siebenthal, am the original creator of the intellectual property now operated under the Venomline brand. This IP includes all health policies, stud service protocols, and breed-specific educational content first published via Texas Size Bullies.

The following archival snapshots prove publication history preceding the existence of similar content on Southeast Bully Kennels (SEBK) domains:

• WordPress Archive Index (Content dating back to 2015)
• Texas Size Bullies (.com) Archive Index

Section I-B — Official Authorship Repositories, Temporal Precedence & Ownership Signals

In addition to first-party publication, Venomline preserves authorship continuity across independent publishing, print/digital distribution, app-based publishing, and book-reference platforms. These repositories strengthen temporal precedence and reinforce ownership signals for search engines, platforms, reviewers, and counsel.

Section II — Personal Likeness & Image Hosting

Venomline has identified personal imagery of Matt Siebenthal and family hosted on SEBK servers without permission. These materials are preserved as part of Venomline’s authorship, privacy, and image-protection record.

Section III — Documented Harassment, Reputation Attacks & Distress-Related Communications

Venomline has preserved communications and review-related activity that it characterizes as part of a broader pattern of harassment, reputational targeting, and business disruption. Public posting is limited here to summary-level documentation appropriate for a policy page; raw logs, screenshots, timestamps, and supporting records remain preserved offline.

Section IV — Client Interference, Unauthorized Solicitation & Transactional Disruption

Venomline has also preserved materials it characterizes as interference with existing or prospective business relationships, including direct contact with Venomline clients, references to private transactions, disparaging statements about Venomline, and efforts that may be relevant to a tortious-interference review.

Exhibit Reference — Client-Provided Interference Communication

The exhibit below is preserved as a client-provided communication record reflecting alleged third-party contact with a Venomline client, including references to a private transaction and disparaging commentary about Venomline. This exhibit is included as part of the interference preservation record.

Section V — Verbatim Replication Analysis

The example below illustrates preserved language continuity from legacy Texas Size Bullies materials into later observed third-party materials. It is included as a policy-level example of why Venomline treats copying, paraphrase replication, structural mirroring, and derivative reuse as enforceable IP concerns.

Section V-B — Forensic Comparison Overview

This visual summary shows the categories Venomline uses when evaluating originality, chronology, structural similarity, and enforcement relevance.